Select Page

Talia Soglin

Members of the Legislative Committee voted to propose a controversial change in the city's governing body Tuesday night.

The same committee made the changes after a September marathon public hearing, in which health professionals and community members expressed concern that the new ordinance would give the city more opportunity to handle lead checks and cuts. After Tuesday's 4-1 vote, the changes proposed by the Harp administration will now be voted on by the full council of councilors, probably in December.

But Ward 26 senior Darry Breaking, the only member of the committee who voted against moving the protocol, said the proposed protocol was a step in the wrong direction for New Haven.

"We are taking a step forward for the platform that preceded this city," he said at Tuesday's meeting.

Since the September public hearing, the city's health department has made minor changes to the proposed changes. For example, the department added a provision stating that the city's Council of Health Ministers should withdraw from the Department of Health's policy. Corporate Deputy Catherine Laamar and interim health director Roslin Hamilton presented the changes to the committee, noting that the changes now contain a number of guidelines to follow when implementing health directives, and civil penalties for violations.

At the heart of the heated debate Tuesday night was one word that was also included in the September issue of the ceremony: "Permission".

In a section detailing lead testing procedures, the proposed order states that the health director has the right to have tests performed when the child checks for elevated lead levels in the blood, but this is not mandatory. On Tuesday, executives debated whether the city, which is currently in the midst of class action to lose its policy, should allow that flexibility.

New Haven's legal aid lawyer Amy Marx and one of the plaintiffs are calling for the perpetrators not to promote the procedure. At the September hearings, Marx argued that the new statute would "violate" the city's existing law.

"According to this law, they do not have to conduct inspections," Marx said Tuesday evening. "And when you do not test, you find no danger of lead, and then you do not place orders."

According to Elm City's current guidance, the department is required to undergo a thorough inspection, including vacuum cleaners, soil samples and X-ray fluorescents, when a child under the age of six passes a high blood lead level.

The Harp administration proposed new changes as a result of class actions after city officials admitted in court that they had stopped inspecting children's homes to save money by testing five microscopes with five deciliter of lead in their blood. and above, passing only 20 µg / dL and above. Harp said the city has returned to the children-controlled children's homes it inspects at the age of five and approved the new ordinance as it clearly states that the city's leading standard is 5mg / dl. But several judges ruled that the current city leadership law already sets a standard of 5 µg / l / l, depending on the CDC standard.

The current directive sets the city standard at 20 mg / dL "Any other abnormal lead load as specified by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention." The CDC uses 5 mg / dL.

Marx noted that New Haven's state poisoning is a crisis of "brown and black children" in poor neighborhoods, low-income areas, rented homes where they are poisoned by lead paint and by clicking on their homes. "

"What we need to worry about is what should happen to these children," he added.

On Tuesday, LaMarr and Hamilton argued that the discretion contained in the changes was needed to enable the health department to allocate its resources to the most affected children.

"Authorized does not mean we are not going to ignore or do the job or use some form of non-protection for these children," LaMar said. He then said that he could not think of a situation where the charter would "allow the health department to ignore children who have high blood levels."

Prior to voting to move the protocol to full council, the committee added a number of legislation, many of which to the city's Leading Paint Advisory Committee, an informal group of health and housing professionals, which Hamilton and LaMr said had consulted on the charter.

The wills reaffirmed the language that would require councilors to approve appointments to the commission. They also voted in favor of adding language that would require the group to be represented by "legal services", changes adapted from Breakingen's initial proposal to be clearly called New Haven Legal Assistance. Alders changed the official name of the lead console from "committee" to "board", which would allow templates to make appointments for vacant panel positions.

Still two members of the informal advisory committee sent letters to political prisoners Tuesday expressing concerns about the protocol. Amanda DeCew, who is in the case of family nurses in Fair Haven, wrote that she was not informed that the revised order would be presented to the defendants on Tuesday.

"To my knowledge," he wrote, "this review was not submitted to the committee, and no meeting was scheduled before the new amendments were reviewed.

Karen Dubo-Walton, executive director of Elm City Communities and another non-official board member, urged the commission to wait for the ceremony. He suggested that sweets "continue to hear from experts" and "review significant data" before new legislation is adopted. Ward 21 Alder Steve Winter & # 11; who testified against Tuesday's new ceremony, also called for maidens to wait for more specific lead poisoning information to be available to the city.

At the end of the meeting, Ward 25 Council of Elders Adam Martand said he was convinced that the city needed more discretion in how it handled cases, citing the fact that the administration would soon return to newly elected Mayor ick aston Eliker. Ward 22 Alder Jeannette Morrison, Ward 9 Alder Charles Deker GRD & # 39; 19 and Ward 27 Alder Richard Furlow also voted to advance the protocol, but Furlow said he hoped for further changes to the law.

The proposed changes will now be moved to the entire legislature, which will probably hear the protocol at its first session in December.

Talia Soglin |: talia.soglin@yale.edu:



Source link